Home Field Economic Advantage?
How to measure the true economic impact Texas A&M University’s first-ever College Football Playoff game will have on Aggieland.

Helping Texans make the best real estate decisions since 1971.

The Aggie faithful awaits a momentous arrival in late December. Of course, I’m referring to the Miami Hurricanes, who will visit Kyle Field on December 20 for Texas A&M University’s first College Football Playoff game. Many will prognosticate about the on-the-field outcome between the number 7 and 10 ranked teams. My goal here is to suggest how we might assess the consequences for the local economy in College Station-Bryan. As the author of numerous impact studies, I’m aware of their uses and limits. I have not evaluated any studies of local home games, nor have I run my own model. What follows are thoughts on how we might evaluate the economic impact of this game, or any economic event.
What is an economic impact study? It is the bread and butter of tourism and economic development officials who use it to evaluate the merits of economic projects or policies. The findings can motivate officials to give financial or other support to a project in expectation of a big payoff for the community. Think about a prudent business owner who forecasts their sales to better plan staffing and orders. An economic impact study is like a sales forecast for all businesses in an area. Because there is no practical way to collect financial data on hundreds or thousands of local businesses, these studies rely on generic formulas, summary statistics, and, all too often, educated guesses. You’ll also see large margins of error in the result.
Impact studies usually consider the immediate (or direct) impact of an event and spillover (indirect) impacts. Immediate impacts are hard to measure, but usually easier than measuring the spillover effects. In practice, bigger and more diverse economies will see bigger spillover impacts as they have a greater variety of businesses. For instance, let’s say a local bartender makes an extra $100 in tips the day before the game. This is a direct impact. If she lives in a huge metropolitan area, like Dallas-Fort Worth, she will find more places to spend that money compared to living in a smaller region like the College Station-Bryan Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). If she spends it online, very little will go to the local economy no matter the region. Leakage can be very high in many cases. Can we have any sense of how reliable an impact study is? Sometimes we can get a feel for it.

Ultimately, economic impact depends on how much of the extra spending can be kept in the region and recirculated among the accounts of local businesses. Tourist spending ends up in one of three places: with local hotels, restaurants and bars, or retail stores. This is a temporary increase in local business that we can compare to business as usual. Keep in mind that these local firms would do some business even without the event. The potential to increase business over their baseline is key. These firms have some slack capacity. Most restaurants will have unused tables and hotels will have some unrented rooms on a given day. So, when the extra customers show up for the event, local firms can accommodate some of them. How much slack does the local economy have?
To start, we can say that on an average day, the retailers, hotels, restaurants, and bars in the College Station-Bryan MSA do $6 million of business. How much extra business they can do really determines the net impact of the event. If we assume they are at 50 percent capacity, then a $12 million day is reasonable. If they are at 75 percent capacity then, $8 million is about the limit. Of course, we should only count the extra spending, not the daily average plus the extra. These assumptions would mean $2 million to $6 million in direct spending and some additional amount of spillover.
Another way to assess recurring events is by looking at what happened in the past. I consulted hotel receipts and sales tax revenue for Brazos County since January 2022. This period included four seasons of home games (2022 to 2025). Using a simple statistical test, I detected a meaningful increase in hotel receipts for these home games. On average, local lodgers have enjoyed an additional $1.2 million for each home game. We cannot know how much of this increase ended up locally. Hotels may increase their rates for home games. The higher bill will result in more local hotel taxes, but most of the extra revenue may be sent to the hotel chain’s corporate headquarters.
Using the same approach, I could not find a statistically significant change in sales tax revenue over the same period. These results make sense. Hotels reflect visitor activity, so we should expect to see a noticeable change there. Sales taxes reflect spending by visitors and by many more locals. Some, maybe more, spending by visitors displaces spending by locals that would have happened if the event didn’t take place. It is not uncommon to hear someone say they are staying in or even leaving town during a busy home game weekend. These people wish to avoid the congestion and inconvenience that comes with large crowds. This displacement is very common for one-time events. Historical data suggests a more modest potential economic impact than given in the capacity assumptions above.
My commentary is not intended to deny that there are net economic benefits to any particular event. Based on experience and the crude estimates above, I would expect a home playoff game to generate several million dollars in true net economic impact, and it should be a net positive impact to local government revenue. There probably isn’t a study that can say much more.

The bottom line is, good impact studies can help us understand the consequences of a major economic event. At the end of the day, however, even good studies only count what we measure in dollars. The enduring impacts of December 20 may be elsewhere and intangible. Think of the brand boost for the university. Think about the kids who will first encounter Texas A&M University while watching that game and who will become prospective students and future Aggies. Think of the nostalgia and pride of the alumni. Finally, think how good it will feel to beat the hell outta Miami. Who would put a price on that?
Views expressed on The 338 are those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by the Texas Real Estate Research Center, Division of Research, or Texas A&M University.
Check out the latest issue of our flagship publication.
Receive our economic and housing reports and newsletters for free.
Housing
As the state’s population grows, so does the need for more housing. Here are the data and tools you need to keep up with housing market trends in your area.
Commercial
Whether you’re talking about DFW’s financial services industry, Austin’s tech sector, Houston’s energy corridor, or the medical hub that is San Antonio, commercial real estate is big business in Texas.
Rural Land
Mineral rights. Water issues. Wildlife management and conservation. Eminent domain. The number of factors driving Texas land markets is as big as the state itself. Here’s information that can help.
Economy
Texas is a large, diversified state boasting one of the biggest economies in the world. Our reports and articles help you understand why.
Data & Reports
Center research is fueled by accurate, high-quality, up-to-date data acquired from such sources as Texas MLSs, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the U.S. Census Bureau. Data and reports included here are free.
News
Stay current on the latest happenings around the Center and the state with our news releases, NewsTalk Texas online searchable news database, and more.
Conferences
Our popular Outlook for Texas Land Markets conference provides a yearly, comprehensive look at the issues impacting the state’s rural land markets.
About Us
Established in 1971, the Texas Real Estate Research Center is the nation’s largest publicly funded organization devoted to real estate research. Learn more about our history here and meet our team.
Helping Texans make the best real estate decisions since 1971.
You are now being directed to an external page. Please note that we are not responsible for the content or security of the linked website.



